← Search

Amanda Sweet

Charleston, SC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 20W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amanda Sweet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-08-31 · LCTA18/Grochowski/CTC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meghan Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · LCTA18/Grochowski/CTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Suzen McCabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jodi George / Emma Clark
2026-08-12 · LCTA18/Grochowski/CTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Feuerstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · LCTA18/Grochowski/CTC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Andreea Bodea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · LCTA18/Grochowski/CTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Suzen McCabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · LCTA18/Sweet/CTC · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-6
W
2026-06-25 · LCTA18/Smith/CTC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blair Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · LCTA18/Anderson/CTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meghan Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · LCTA18/Anderson/CTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meghan Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-21 · LCTA18/Anderson/CTC · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-14 · LCTA18/Anderson/CTC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meghan Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · LCTA18/Anderson/CTC · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 53.8% of games
5.5
60%
6W–4L · 52.4% of games
2.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
16 matches
#1 Singles
21%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams