← Search

Ivy-Lee Frawley

Midland, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 30W–25L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Ivy-Lee Frawley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Williams-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Mims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · McKenzie-CC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neil Desai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-12 · McKenzie-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · McKenzie-CC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · McKenzie-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
Sun Kim / Julie Sway
2026-05-17 · Byrd-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frances Jean Frawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-06 · Frawley-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mohammad Pathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · Frawley-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Kyte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-10 · Williams-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Saravanan Veeramani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · Williams-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Saravanan Veeramani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-04 · Williams-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Mims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · Williams-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Saravanan Veeramani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.9% of games
3.0
54.8%
23W–19L · 51.3% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King