← Search

Charlotte Beran

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 80W–53L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Charlotte Beran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Gittins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison McGrath
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-08 · Racquet Club 4 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Sarah Miller
2026-05-01 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · with Danielle Scheschuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · Scarborough 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Scheschuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-13 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison McGrath
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-10 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · Scarborough 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Seiferas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
L
2026-04-08 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elisa Siesel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-06 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison McGrath
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · Scarborough 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Scheschuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
21W–7L · 62.1% of games
3.0
56.1%
32W–25L · 52.6% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.8% of games
5.5
68%
17W–8L · 55.5% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
33 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer