← Search

Joe Kelly

Pittsburgh, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 29W–10L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Joe Kelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Oxford Smash Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Blaze of Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · PTA Warriors · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · Blaze of Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Felipe Cavalcanti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Blaze of Aces · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Blaze of Aces · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · Blaze of Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victor Montes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · PTA Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Wolk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · Blaze of Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rick Puhalla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · PTA Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Wolk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · PTA Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Wolk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
W
2026-05-02 · Blaze of Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 59% of games
6.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams