← Search

Angelica Singh

Wexford, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 52W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Angelica Singh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-06-13 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emma Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eleni Dedousis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clint Boling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
Heather Gallagher / Dominic Costa
2026-02-07 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clint Boling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 5-4
L
2026-01-31 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clint Boling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-23 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clint Boling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-18 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clint Boling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-12-21 · Oxford 9.0 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nate Heidengren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-12-14 · Mt Lebanon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hiromi Katayama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · Oxford 9.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clint Boling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-11-01 · Oxford 9.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Clint Boling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-26 · Oxford 9.0 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Avik Agrawal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 66.3% of games
4.0
100%
19W–0L · 68% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.9% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.5% of games
9.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova