← Search

Miesje Zimmermann

— year-end
40 matches · 31W–9L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Miesje Zimmermann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-07-12 · Piedmont Park (Carrie Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Taylor Cranford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Kassen Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · Piedmont Park (Carrie Smith)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Etzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 7-5
L
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 3-6
W
2026-06-21 · Sugar Creek (Tricinda Waites)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Heilweil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Langan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Heilweil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Langan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
Ashley Grattan-Smith / Susan Sullivan
2026-05-31 · Piedmont Park (Carrie Smith)* · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Ruth Parker / Amy Smith
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Faist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Faist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Teams12 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
75.7%
28W–9L · 60.4% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer