← Search

Kim Gibson

— year-end
85 matches · 50W–35L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kim Gibson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Kim Gibson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-12 · WRC: Volley Vixens Summer:Spencer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Metz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · WRC: Volley Vixens Summer:Spencer · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-3
L
2026-06-11 · Grand Slam - 18+ 3.5 W - No Man´s Land NY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kitterman-Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · WRC: Volley Vixens Summer:Spencer · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-04 · Grand Slam - 18+ 3.5 W - No Man´s Land NY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Limor Pompa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · WRC: Volley Vixens Summer:Spencer · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · Kim Gibson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-5
W
2026-05-20 · WRC: Volley Vixens Summer:Spencer · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Telesco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-12 · Kim Gibson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Woolverton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7
Teams28 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 59% of games
3.5
56.7%
17W–13L · 48.8% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 49% of the time
#1 Singles
49%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova