← Search

Jamye McAlister-Rodgers

Longview, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 26W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jamye McAlister-Rodgers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Get AgRip - Longview HS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Carruthers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Get A gRip- Longview HS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-16 · Get A gRip- Longview HS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Machelle Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Get AgRip - Longview HS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Wheeler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · Get A gRip- Longview HS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Sarah Wilbanks
2026-05-28 · Heimer/Whitus - TRC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · Get AgRip - Longview HS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Rectenwald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-26 · Get A gRip- Longview HS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · Get A gRip- Longview HS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Marcela Woodall / Nikki Berryhill
2026-05-06 · Get A gRip- Longview HS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Leitner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · Get A gRip- Longview HS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · Heimer/Whitus - TRC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
75.9%
22W–7L · 57.9% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 42.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#1 Singles
29%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal