← Search

Kerri Friedman

— year-end
56 matches · 36W–20L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Kerri Friedman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stroman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Milano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Gingras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Meredith Wit / Michelle Hinton
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Gingras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Milano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-01-15 · CC of the South (Nicole Vereen)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stroman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 7-5
W
2026-01-08 · CC of the South (Nicole Vereen)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-12-11 · CC of the South (Nicole Vereen)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-12-04 · CC of the South (Nicole Vereen)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryann Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-13 · CC of the South (Nicole Vereen)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryann Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-07 · CC of the South (Nicole Vereen)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Milano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams7 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 57.4% of games
3.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams