← Search

Pam Leo

— year-end
87 matches · 68W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Pam Leo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
2026-04-14 · King, Chase · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-17 · King, Chase · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chase King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-16 · King, Chase · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chase King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-02-24 · King, Chase · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chase King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-17 · King, Chase · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sage Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-13 · Webb, Jill · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with LI Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-08 · Ruhl, Allison · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-25 · Webb, Jill · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Andrea Hart-Crovetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-09-11 · Webb, Jill · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Andrea Hart-Crovetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-09-10 · Ruhl, Allison · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mindy Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-09 · Bradshaw, Lynn · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Cumberland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-08-26 · Bradshaw, Lynn · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
81%
17W–4L · 66.1% of games
3.0
83.9%
26W–5L · 62% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 69% of games
6.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.5% of games
3.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert