← Search

Sallie Blum

— year-end
37 matches · 14W–23L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Sallie Blum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Allan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Colapietro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Colapietro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Wildstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 6-4
L
2025-07-10 · Hampshires (Cecily Hamilton)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Stanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-26 · Hampshires (Cecily Hamilton)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-19 · Hampshires (Cecily Hamilton)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-06-12 · Hampshires (Cecily Hamilton)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-03 · Hampshires (Cecily Hamilton)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mona Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-15 · Hampshires (Cecily Hamilton)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Inna Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Tindle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.5% of games
4.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer