← Search

Amy Litz

Garnet Valley, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 16W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amy Litz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-07-08 · Concord Crushers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joyann Kroser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · Concord Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Bair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · Concord Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gwen Geibel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Concord Crushers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gwen Geibel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hatton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-1
W
Janet Murphy / Diane Carlin
2025-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Paschal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Katya Fish / Christine di Guglielmo
2025-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Bair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Hickey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Bair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Paschal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe