← Search

Scott Hataway

— year-end
61 matches · 34W–27L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Scott Hataway to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Klinge - Courtmasters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benny Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Klinge - Courtmasters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benny Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · LGCC - Lopez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benny Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
L
2026-06-10 · Klinge - Courtmasters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Cheong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-06 · LGCC - Lopez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benny Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Peter Schmidt / David Berg
2026-05-31 · LGCC - Lopez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benny Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · Team 13 Courtmasters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · Team 13 Courtmasters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rahul Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · LGCC - Lopez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Torben Svenningsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · Team 13 Courtmasters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Ruffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · Team 13 Courtmasters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Siva Jagadeesan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-23 · Team Courtmasters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
3.5
58.1%
25W–18L · 54.1% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
16 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams