← Search

Aleks Diamond-Stanic

Lewiston, ME
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 95W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Aleks Diamond-Stanic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Leah Sommer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-06 · Apex:Chamberlin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Schwepfinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · Apex:Chamberlin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Owen Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Leah Sommer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-02 · Apex:Chamberlin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Owen Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Apex:Chamberlin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Schwepfinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · MTS:Zalegowski · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leah Sommer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · FF:Jackpot Rally:Emmert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Eberhardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · FF:Jackpot Rally:Emmert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Eberhardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-08 · MaineDawgs:Diamond-Stanic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-03-08 · MaineDawgs:Diamond-Stanic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · FF:Sommer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leah Sommer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 63.7% of games
4.5
69%
20W–9L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 73.5% of games
8.0mixed
78%
32W–9L · 61.5% of games
9.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 81% of the time
#1 Doubles
81%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova