← Search

Amanda Sills

Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 24W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amanda Sills to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #4 Doubles · with Elizabeth Pento championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Chelsea Simpson / Heather Doerr
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Elizabeth Pento championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-14 · Grand Hampton - Buitrago · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sanjeev Sati mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · Grand Hampton - Buitrago · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sanjeev Sati mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · PINELLAS/Rodrigues · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-24 · Grand Hampton - Buitrago · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sanjeev Sati mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · Flight Winner/HCC/N. Rodrigues · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Jahns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-17 · Grand Hampton - Buitrago · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mayank Mittal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-16 · PINELLAS/Rodrigues · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Pento
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-10 · Grand Hampton - Buitrago · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mayank Mittal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · Flight Winner/HCC/N. Rodrigues · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · Flight Winner/HCC/N. Rodrigues · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 62% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
7 matches
#1 Singles
19%
6 matches
#2 Singles
13%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer