← Search

Amber Spiegel

Savannah, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 45W–35L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Amber Spiegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Landings - Midwood · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-29 · HHTL40/Hogan/Moss Creek · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-15 · HHTL40/Hogan/Moss Creek · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Braerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Spiegel/Berwitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Berwitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-08 · BP - Helmly/Hollis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Burks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Clayborne Fulchi / Kathryn Waller
2026-07-03 · Spiegel/Berwitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Berwitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · Spiegel/Berwitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Berwitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · BBTL40/HOGAN BLUE/MOSS CREEK · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cinda Oehlke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · Spiegel/Berwitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Berwitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · DP-Helmly/Staudt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dede Laird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · BBTL/ Hogan Blue/ Moss Creek · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cinda Oehlke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · Landings - Kane/Bryant · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 65.8% of games
3.5
55.4%
31W–25L · 51.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 54% of the time
#1 Singles
54%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King