← Search

Ipsita Sethy

Edison, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 21W–50L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ipsita Sethy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Netherwood 1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · Netherwood 1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shyam Behera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-08 · Summer Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Rosenkrantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Sharon Muenster / Sue Kim
2026-06-27 · DVB Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arathi Reddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
L
2026-06-24 · Summer Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-06-20 · DVB Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina LaForte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-19 · Netherwood 1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shyam Behera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-27 · Summer Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina LaForte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · DVB Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sunyoung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · Winter Aces · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · Warren · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · Winter Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Earnecia Hasben-Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.8% of games
3.5
33.3%
11W–22L · 42.8% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.8% of games
7.0mixed
7.1%
1W–13L · 32.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova