← Search

Courtney Macomber

SAN ANSELMO, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 44W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Courtney Macomber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elliott Magnuson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jody Osterweil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jody Osterweil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Derek Boorse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Core mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-19 · MARIN TC 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maddie Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · MARIN TC 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Eastlack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · with Debra Hakman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · Get em Girls/Jacob/Marin · #2 Doubles · with Debra Hakman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · Get em Girls/Jacob/Marin · #2 Doubles · with Debra Hakman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · MARIN TC 40AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-12 · MARIN TC 40AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Verloop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 70.2% of games
3.5
80%
16W–4L · 58.6% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 45.1% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 64% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova