← Search

John Danielsen

— year-end
45 matches · 25W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add John Danielsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-05-03 · RFL:The Swingers:Braun · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melodi Kinsella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-02 · FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/Braun · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregory Jablonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 3-5
L
2026-04-11 · FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/Braun · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Braun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-04 · FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/Braun · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Strayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-29 · RFL:The Swingers:Braun · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Isabela Piza Danielsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-20 · RFL:The Swingers:Braun · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Veale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/Braun · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Satlof
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 6-0
W
2026-02-08 · RFL:The Swingers:Braun · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Isabela Piza Danielsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · FV:SorryNotSorry:Danielsen/Cote · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Wellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-17 · MLM:Lincer/ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Scarfo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-16 · MLM:Lincer/ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Riggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
Robbie Glassman / David Lee
2025-12-06 · FV:SorryNotSorry:Danielsen/Cote · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Scarfo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams19 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.8% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer