← Search

Madison Brasselle

— year-end
20 matches · 2W–18L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Madison Brasselle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
W
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Lovejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Knowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Shubhangi Jain / Barbara Smith
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Quintana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-24 · Piedmont Park (Christine Hang)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zac Orangio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-03 · Piedmont Park (Christine Hang)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zac Orangio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-10 · Piedmont Park (Madison Brasselle)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Lovejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Lisa Bauer / Ann Brown
2025-12-06 · Piedmont Park (Madison Brasselle)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Hang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 3-6
L
2025-11-15 · Piedmont Park (Madison Brasselle)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Coco Yin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-08 · Piedmont Park (Madison Brasselle)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Hang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-07-06 · Piedmont Park (Katie Bryl)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Lovejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-29 · Piedmont Park (Katie Bryl)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Hang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.9% of games
3.0
7.1%
1W–13L · 26.1% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 55% of the time
#2 Doubles
55%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert