← Search

Grace Neal

Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 65W–28L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Grace Neal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
Jennifer Williams / Elyssa Snelgrove
2026-05-08 · LCTA18/Anderson-Oneil/Ion · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Craft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Cassandra Andrus / Rebecca Martin
2026-04-15 · LCTA18/Wray/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juliann Loesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · LCTA40/DANIEL/MPR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Ainsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Ainsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Eckhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juliann Loesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-22 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Ainsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
11W–0L · 78% of games
3.5
70.5%
31W–13L · 60.2% of games
4.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 50.6% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 51% of the time
#1 Singles
51%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams