← Search

Luh-Ling Giacomantonio

Collegeville, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 65W–34L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Luh-Ling Giacomantonio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with LAURA KING
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-25 · Kicking Aces Summer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Mary Fesnak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · Kicking Aces Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Mary Fesnak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-16 · No Love Lost · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Tempestini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-5
W
2026-06-14 · Kicking Aces Summer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · Simply Smashed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · Frog 18+ Zieske · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Serren Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-05 · Simply Smashed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · No Love Lost · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with LAURA KING
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-28 · Frog 18+ Zieske · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with LAURA KING
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-05-21 · Frog 18+ Zieske · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with LAURA KING
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-08 · Simply Smashed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 77.1% of games
3.0
84.4%
27W–5L · 61% of games
3.5
48.8%
21W–22L · 48.9% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer