← Search

Jeffrey Marks

Washington, DC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 38W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Marks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-08-16 · DC Tennis Club (7.0 mixed) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Krudys mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-6
L
2026-08-02 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · DC Tennis Club (7.0 mixed) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Horowitz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-05 · DC Tennis Club (7.0 mixed) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Krudys mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · DC Tennis Club (7.0 mixed) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Pollitt Paisner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · DC Tennis Club (7.0 mixed) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Whitney Paxson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-5
L
2026-05-31 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Paisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-4
W
2026-05-03 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Borchien Lai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
W
2026-04-26 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Dobrozsi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-2
L
2026-04-11 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Tringali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 64.3% of games
3.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 45.8% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 61.3% of games
6.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer