← Search

Barbara Claassen

Noblesville, IN
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 4W–13L · seasons 2023–2024

Captains: add Barbara Claassen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
Melanie Scheetz / Leslie Smulyan
2024-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caylie Dicken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-01-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Manzur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Manzur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2023-11-02 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 W, Hinchman (CRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Manzur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jill Maynard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-10-29 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 W, Hinchman (CRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Manzur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anna Ristow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
Carrie Grass / Karen Roberts
2023-10-05 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 W, Hinchman (CRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Manzur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Laurel Burns / Gayle Jones
2023-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Joan Lawrence
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
Sarah Ferguson / Tara Moore
2023-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Manzur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Sarah Ferguson / Tara Moore
2023-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquin Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 31.6% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova