← Search

Jane Dickson

Shreveport, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 31W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jane Dickson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Sella/18/6.5/CWD/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sapna Tank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · Watters/18/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leigh Flood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · Q-Petersen/18/7.5/CWD/POTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexis Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Watters/18/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leigh Flood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Sella/18/6.5/CWD/POTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen McCoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · Flood/18/3-3.5-4/TWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shani Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Armstrong-Mitchell/18/3.0/MXD/ERCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Wellman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · Flood/18/3-3.5-4/TWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · Armstrong-Mitchell/18/3.0/MXD/ERCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-27 · Armstrong-Mitchell/18/3.0/MXD/ERCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Wellman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · Armstrong-Mitchell/18/3.0/MXD/ERCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-07 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Indira Sartin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
8W–8L · 52.4% of games
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.3% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.6% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 52% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.9% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert