← Search

Cody Burns

San Angelo, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 55W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Cody Burns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-08-10 · Bright · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kayla Hubble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Stephanie Lanford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lara Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Post
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Herring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emilee Wuthrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Shelly Burkett / Lauren Wilde Lux
2026-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Albert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Molly Warnack / Kimberly Collins
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lara Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Haley Love / Erin McCleer
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayla Hubble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
74.5%
35W–12L · 60.7% of games
4.0
48%
12W–13L · 51.3% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Singles
12%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe