← Search

Hayden Perkins

Madison, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 20W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Hayden Perkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-06-03 · Stewart, Neil · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lilly Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · Stewart, Neil · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Parker Plunkett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · Stewart, Neil · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Parker Plunkett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · Stewart, Neil · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Parker Plunkett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · Jeffreys, John · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Baley Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-02 · Jeffreys, John · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brendon Mcleod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-26 · Jeffreys, John · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-19 · Jeffreys, John · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jace Correro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-26 · Jeffreys, John · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-19 · Jeffreys, John · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-12 · Jeffreys, John · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-05 · Jeffreys, John · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Baley Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 71% of games
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 65.9% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.4% of games
3.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova