Linda Ratcliff
19 matches · 8W–11L · seasons 2024–2026
Captains: add Linda Ratcliff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history19 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 45.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
26%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.