← Search

Jade Sipes

Vestavia, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 31W–21L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Jade Sipes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Hoover CC - Goetz/Watts · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katelyn Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Hoover C. Club - Steely · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tabitha Hardman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-17 · HCC - Watts · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley McCauley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Hoover C. Club - Steely · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Bolt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · HCC - Watts · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cassidy Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · HCC - Sipes/Dodd · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katelyn Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · HCC - Sipes/Dodd · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Talley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · Hoover CC - Watts/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katelyn Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · Hoover CC - Watts/Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clair Gammill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-07 · Hoover CC - Watts/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katelyn Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-31 · Hoover CC - Watts/Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clair Gammill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · Hoover CC - Watts/Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clair Gammill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.5%
24W–17L · 50.7% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.6% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King