← Search

Catherine Williams

Auburn, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 54W–20L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Catherine Williams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-09-12 · White-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Giovanna Guerra-Troche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-29 · White-CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-25 · Williams · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sumin Han
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Victoria Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Victoria Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelley Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Delanie Edwards / Kate Wu
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Victoria Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Melton-Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Victoria Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Melton-Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · Fleming/Rebidue-CC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Becky Overby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-02 · Lagoon-SHARP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Norris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.5% of games
3.0
82.1%
23W–5L · 67.5% of games
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 57.1% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.2% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 72.5% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
31 matches
#1 Singles
20%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova