← Search

Leah OGwynn

— year-end
74 matches · 28W–46L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Leah OGwynn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-09-08 · PRC - Ashman · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · PRC - Vandy · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jessica VanLandingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · PRC - Vandy · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rebecca Conwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · PRC - Ashman Spring 2026 Tuesday · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Bevier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-16 · PRC - Vandy · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Crandall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-09 · PRC - Vandy · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Morgan Vanlandingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-31 · PRC - Ashman Spring 2026 Tuesday · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Bevier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-19 · PRC - Vandy · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-17 · PRC - Ashman Spring 2026 Tuesday · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathrin Eberle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-02 · PRC - Vandy · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-11 · PRC - Ashman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica VanLandingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-09 · PRC - Vandy · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Crandall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Teams20 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
60%
18W–12L · 54.3% of games
3.0
13.8%
4W–25L · 35.6% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#1 Singles
23%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#2 Singles
10%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova