← Search

Ashley Vance

Hattiesburg, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 50W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ashley Vance to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-09-02 · 40+ 6.5 Schwartz Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · Vance-18+ 6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kaitlyn Oswalt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Sportsplex 5.5 Combo - Walker · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Kathryn Burge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-03 · HCC Combo 5.5- Toups · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Wilhelmina Jarvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Boykin 3.0 mixed 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Boykin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-25 · Boykin 3.0 mixed 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roberto Amay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · Hattiesburg 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bobby Hanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · 2026 Duke 40+ 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-18 · 2026 Duke 40+ 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-05 · Vance 3.0- Tatum · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Toups
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · 2026 Duke 40+ 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · Hattiesburg 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alen Hajnal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 54.3% of games
3.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 50.6% of games
5.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 63.6% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.6% of games
3.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#1 Singles
19%
16 matches
#3 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert