← Search

Lana Lyubimova

— year-end
40 matches · 24W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lana Lyubimova to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-07-31 · USTA-Naumenko · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Yana Krylova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · USTA Campus-Naumenko · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Desiree Van Staden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · USTA Campus-Naumenko · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Swapna Singireddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · USTA-Naumenko · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Fabiana Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Brianne Larsen / Hannah Barton
2026-07-08 · USTA Campus-Naumenko · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Desiree Van Staden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · USTA Campus-Lyubimova · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Luis Cortes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
Gail Burr / Tracy King
2026-05-15 · USTA Campus-Naumenko · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Holcomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-28 · USTA Campus-Lyubimova · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tyson Fiore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-03 · USTA Campus-Naumenko · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Grinch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · USTA Campus-Wu · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcela Bernardinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · USTA Campus-Naumenko · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Johns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-24 · USTA Campus-Jackson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tyson Fiore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Teams26 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 84.2% of games
3.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 54% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.5% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert