← Search

Amanda Dale

Houston, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 20W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amanda Dale to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-06-10 · Pine Forest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desirae Regueiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Pine Forest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Battle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-01 · Pine Forest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Hotzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-13 · Pine Forest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Hotzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-22 · Pine Forest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · Pine Forest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Hotzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-09 · Pine Forest - 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Miles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-10-26 · Pine Forest - 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Miles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-19 · Pine Forest - 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Miles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
Courtney Coston / Emily Lewis
2025-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Olivier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.6% of games
3.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert