← Search

Bradley Schwoegler

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 57W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Bradley Schwoegler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-08-19 · NJ ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oscar Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · SS-H GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taryn Fleming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-12 · NJ ORANGE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-1
W
2026-08-09 · SS-H GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · SS-H GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · SS-H GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taryn Fleming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · SS-H GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taryn Fleming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · NJ RED · #2 Male Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · WP PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Burke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Jessica Hilton / David Morgan
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · with Ana Hunsinger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · NJ RED · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Hand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 64.4% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 70.3% of games
7.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 59% of games
8.5mixed
100%
8W–0L · 66.2% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer