← Search

Danielle Lamson

Holly Springs, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 24W–47L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Danielle Lamson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-08-28 · CAS.Belyea · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Debbie Goldstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Samamra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-01 · CAS.Belyea · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Sandidge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · CAS.DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Bonnie Mulder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · CAS.Belyea · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · CAS.DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Diana Fisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Loni Belyea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Samamra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · CAS.DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Bonnie Mulder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · with Loni Belyea championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Diana Fisch championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 34.6% of games
2.5
43.8%
21W–27L · 49% of games
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 18.3% of games
5.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#3 Singles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
10%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova