← Search

Chelsea Mills

Boerne, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 40W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Mills to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-07-31 · Ranch Raquettes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Samson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · Hit & Run · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Uhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Sharon Davis / Abby Holahan
2026-06-14 · here FOR it · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Uhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · here FOR it · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Uhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · here FOR it · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Uhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · here FOR it · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Uhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Baylee Woolard
2026-06-11 · Flames · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-10 · Ranch Raquettes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Samson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · Hit & Run · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · Flames · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · Hit & Run · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · Flames · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.7% of games
3.0
77.8%
28W–8L · 61.2% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 39.4% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#2 Singles
22%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#1 Singles
16%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer