← Search

Annaliese Gardner

Farmington, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 43W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Annaliese Gardner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Sandy Weeks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-01 · Liberty Park-Kesler · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · Liberty Park-Kesler · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Hepworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Lori Carter / David Klein
2026-05-08 · La Vida Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chet Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · Liberty Park-Kesler · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · La Vida Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chet Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-20 · Liberty Park-Kesler · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-13 · Liberty Park-Kesler · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · La Vida Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chet Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
Tina Taylor
2026-04-06 · Liberty Park-Kesler · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · LP-Kesler · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Hepworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 64.2% of games
3.0
63.2%
24W–14L · 55% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
28 matches
#1 Singles
22%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova