← Search

LeeAnn Wood

— year-end
28 matches · 16W–12L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add LeeAnn Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Team 26 Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Chalfant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0T · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0T · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Chalfant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-11 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-06 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-27 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Stokley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Lindsey Petersen / Heather Graham
2026-02-20 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-13 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-10 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-09 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyla Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-06 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams11 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova