← Search

Carissa Richardson

Rome, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 14W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Carissa Richardson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-07-13 · Anderson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-02 · Anderson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kit Stockton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · Anderson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · Cargle · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ronna Sabino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-21 · Cargle · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Constance Fallin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-24 · CVTA/Abby Hastings · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kit Stockton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-19 · CVTA/Abby Hastings · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Fife
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-17 · CVTA/Abby Hastings · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Cargle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
Libby Lanier / Julia Johnson
2026-02-10 · CVTA/Abby Hastings · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Fife
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-28 · Hastings · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Amy Mitchell / Tina Waggoner
2025-10-14 · Hastings · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-10-07 · Hastings · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Cargle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 60.2% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe