Sue Wohlford-Bork
67 matches · 49W–18L · seasons 2023–2026
Captains: add Sue Wohlford-Bork to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history67 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams15 teams · 2025–2026
LCTA (A) 3.5W 55 & Over (Raines)
LCTA (B) 3.0W 55 & Over (Parrott)
LCTA 39/Parrott/Wild Dunes
LCTA18/HUMPHRIES-FLORKOWSKI/WILDDUNES
LCTA18/Koepenick-Jackson/Wild Dunes
LCTA18/Riddle/WildDunes
LCTA39/Witheford/Wild Dunes
LCTA40/Koepenick/Wild Dunes
LCTA40/Parrott/Wild Dunes
LCTA40/Witheford/Wild Dunes
LCTA40/Witheford/Wild Dunes
LCTA54/Parrott/Wild Dunes
WILD
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 68.3% of games
3.0
77.8%
28W–8L · 65% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 25.9% of games
5.5
100%
6W–0L · 79.3% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.