← Search

Stacey Angstadt

— year-end
57 matches · 30W–27L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stacey Angstadt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Suzanne Kane championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Tennis The Menace · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dearing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · Net Worth · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with MaryBeth Alvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · Mood Swings · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kendall Ritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · Tennis The Menace · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Pirozek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-08 · Delcastle Sapphires · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tricia Harling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · Net Worth · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Selma Menezes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · Mood Swings · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kendall Ritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-27 · Delcastle Sapphires · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Giacchino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-07 · Net Worth · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Stewart-Seaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-05 · Tennis The Menace · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Valenti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · Mood Swings · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dearing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.7% of games
3.0
45.2%
19W–23L · 51.4% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer