← Search

Alan Schroeder

Baton Rouge, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 32W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Alan Schroeder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Schroeder/55/6.5/CM/CCLA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kip Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · Mulkey/40/6.5/CM/CCLA · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madison Mulkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Schroeder/55/6.5/CM/CCLA · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kip Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · Schroeder/55/6.5/CM/CCLA · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kip Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · Mulkey/40/6.5/CM/CCLA · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · Dooley/18/3.0/M/BRCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clifton Ourso Jr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-01 · Dooley/18/3.0/M/BRCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patrick Dooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-30 · Smith/40/3.0/M/CCLA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Coby Courtois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-25 · Dooley/18/3.0/M/BRCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roger Bryson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-23 · Smith/40/3.0/M/CCLA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kip Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-18 · Dooley/18/3.0/M/BRCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-16 · Generes/18/3.5/CCLA · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Max Huff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
30%
3W–7L · 49.7% of games
3.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.6% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.2% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.8% of games
2.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.9% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 71% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova