← Search

Monica Kremer

— year-end
43 matches · 22W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Monica Kremer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-06-16 · Net Worthy at The Brook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Hynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
W
2026-06-09 · Net Worthy at The Brook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Hynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Net Worthy at The Brook · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Carfagno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · Smashing serpents · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Dever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-26 · Net Worthy at The Brook · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · Smashing serpents · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Net Worthy at The Brook · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Marciano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-14 · Smashing serpents · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Malott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-12 · Net Worthy at The Brook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · Smashing serpents · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Malott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Net Worthy at The Brook · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniela Cipriano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-28 · Net Worthy at The Brook · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Hynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams5 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
56.4%
22W–17L · 51.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova