← Search

Sandie Barns

— year-end
61 matches · 27W–34L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Sandie Barns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Labadie/GR/Day2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Adrienne Labadie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · Grimes/GR/Day3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Labadie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-26 · Corley/GR/tri 3.5 DAY · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Adrienne Labadie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · Corley/GR/tri 3.5 DAY · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jorjana Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · Swiggett/GR/3.5 tri · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hannah Irvine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · Swiggett/GR/3.5 tri · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hannah Irvine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Corley/GR/tri 3.5 DAY · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Harlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-05-14 · Orange 1/Labadie/GR/18s 2.5W · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · Grimes/GR/18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · Orange 1/Labadie/GR/18s 2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Isbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-20 · Grimes/GR/18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Isbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-14 · Grimes/GR/18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Reece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
Teams17 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
51%
26W–25L · 50.5% of games
3.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 36.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer