← Search

Riley Beirne

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 25W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Riley Beirne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Tiffany Chau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Tiffany Chau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Tiffany Chau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Tiffany Chau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Tiffany Chau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Tiffany Chau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Tiffany Chau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · NWW-RBW-Chau · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Levitsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-01 · NWW-RBW-Chau · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · NWW-RBW-Chau · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Chau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · AYTC-Here for a good time-Chen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cassie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · NWW-RBW-Chau · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.7% of games
3.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 43.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 34.5% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal