← Search

Jamie Chandler

Jonesboro, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 44W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jamie Chandler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
Alley Bell / Jessica Blackburn
2026-09-09 · Myers-Kibler/JB/3Oaks · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Maleigh Inboden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-09-09 · Cissell/JB/APCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melanie Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-30 · Cissell/JB/APCC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Misty Zaffarano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-5
W
2026-08-20 · Myers-Kibler/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Morgan Lovelace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Myers-Kibler/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany McFadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · Milton/JB/3Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Milton/JB/3Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Jumper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-05 · Parker/JB/RPCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crys Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · KParker/JB/Three Oaks · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janelle Hocutt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · KParker/JB/Three Oaks · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Box
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 66.9% of games
3.0
50%
7W–7L · 49.6% of games
5.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 65.6% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.3% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#2 Singles
11%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova