← Search

Amy Benchener

Berwyn, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 64W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amy Benchener to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-07-29 · UMLY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with So Young Jang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · UMLY · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
Sally Randall / Caryn Gargalovic
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Sule Hoffman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · UMLY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sule Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · UMLY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sule Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · UMLY · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-05 · Waynesborough 3.5 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-2
W
2026-06-04 · Slice Girls UMLY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sule Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · UMLY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Quereau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-29 · Waynesborough 3.5 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-28 · Slice Girls UMLY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sule Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 56.2% of games
3.0
78%
39W–11L · 62.4% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 61% of the time
#1 Singles
61%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams