← Search

Wendy Walker

Sammamish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 87W–64L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Wendy Walker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Walker · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-3
L
2026-07-13 · Walker · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · PL-Walker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jason Messer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · HY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Qiwen Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · HY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meng Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · PL-Walker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · HY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meng Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-22 · PL-Friedman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · PL-Friedman · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · PL-Baby Got Backhand-Buck · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eloisa Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · Walker · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
70.3%
26W–11L · 54.9% of games
3.0
52.5%
32W–29L · 51.3% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 41.7% of games
6.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.3% of games
0.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.9% of games
5.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.6% of games
6.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert