← Search

Jim Lord

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 81W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jim Lord to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-08-23 · GAC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Frankie Robinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
Ty Donaldson / Christopher Vaughan
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Raemer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Patton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jerry Augustin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Lon Robbins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Molly Robbins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Molly Robbins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Molly Robbins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-13 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Adam Killian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · GAC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Frankie Robinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Molly Robbins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ray Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
82.1%
32W–7L · 60.9% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
76%
19W–6L · 59% of games
6.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams